My tradition (the Baptist part of the Nonconformist or radical Reformation) has stressed the idea that Scripture is perspicuous, that the Bible is easy to understand, and that anyone can understand it - or at least grasp its essentials - without special training or equipment. Yet there are for sure some difficult passages. There are also passages that seem to flat out contradict other parts of the Bible. How can you call a book like that "perspicuous"?
In this post I'll argue that one key mistake we make is to think of the Bible as if all its parts were also "Bible", they aren't they are merely fragments!
At the end of the book of Ezra there a horrid account of Ezra and the "officials" gang up to force Judeans who have married foreign women to divorce them and send away them and their children. What do we do with passages like this? And as part of our thinking on this, where DO our values come from? If they don't come from the Bible, then do we have to use values established elsewhere to "judge" Scripture? Many people today do just that. But I'm a Baptist, Scripture is my final authority in matters of faith and practice, or is it?
Many people think the Bible is like a hologram, any part of which shows the truth. The practice of scholars, preachers and teachers, of citing single verses or lists of verses to demonstrate something, encourages this view. The claim that the Bible is "inerrant" in all its parts seems to seal the idea. Yet in the Bible God itself told us in the Bible that it is false!
How do we picture Scripture? That is what is/are the (unconscious) models in our heads as we read and use the Bible? This 'cast refers particularly to Gen 18:20ff. and Amos 7.
Jesus as fulfilment of Scripture: Slavery and Spanking
This 'cast continues the theme of Jesus as the "fulfilment" of Scripture, looking at one topic that's been settled for decades, and another that's as hot as today's headlines. (At least here in NZ where a bill to criminalise parents spanking children is set to become law shortly!)
